Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > A couple caveats: > > On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 11:11:15AM -0400, John Sullivan wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Berry) writes: >> >> > I think the "GNU Task List" item should be removed, since it's a subset >> > of "Help GNU". >> > >> > Seems like "Dev Documentation" should be under "Developer Info". >> > >> > Now that so many vc's are supported, is "Anonymous CVS" really worth >> > having in the sidebar? The specific instructions on the project pages >> > are much more useful IMHO. >> > >> >> I second all of these suggestions. After removing Anonymous CVS, > > That's a request from RMS, because sometimes people are not clever > enough to find the CVS instructions and ask the Emacs mailing list. > > CVS is also still the most widely used VCS. >
IMO, "Anonymous CVS" doesn't help much here. If this is the goal, it seems like it should be under Site Help and should be something like "CVS Instructions"? > >> I think the >> Cryptographic Software Notice could be moved under Site Help (does it even >> need >> to be so prominent?), > > Yes, it needs to be proeminent. RMS asked to put it clearly. This is > the remnent of the law against exportation of cryptographic software > in the US, which was recently relaxed. Consider this text a legal > obligation (check http://www.kernel.org/ for a more proeminent > notice). > OK. > >> and the Developer Info heading removed. >> >> > The "Free Software Directory" is not part of the "GNU Project", but I >> > don't know how to fix that. >> > >> >> That heading could be changed to GNU & FSF, or something like that. > > I'm in favor of keeping 'GNU' and 'FSF' separate concepts :) > What do you mean by this? Is that a yes or no to having the heading be GNU & FSF? -- John Sullivan Manager of Operations GPG Key: AE8600B6
