On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 08:44:08PM +0300, Alexander Shulgin wrote: > > Hi Savannah Hackers, > > > > Today I've put some effort into reviewing new projects. I've also > > tried to clean up obviously void submissions, but there's still around > > a dozen untouched projects pending... > > > > I'll try to do my best to maintain items assigned to me. But I don't > > expect to show any closely matching productivity until next weekend > > (or one more week later), so the projects will pile up again. ;-) > > One thing you can do is ask for resubmission whenever the project > doesn't fit the registration checklist. > > More often than not, people don't answer when we ask for changes :/
Yeah, and as far as I can see, this primarily happens to originally poorly written submissions. But still I'm trying to give some brief hints when rejecting submission--eventually people may learn something. ;) > > May be we could try to find a few more volunteers? I feel like I'm > > the only one actually reviewing projects lately. > > That's a good idea. What are our options? May be we can have a link posted under 'Take Action' section of the front page of www.gnu.org or something like this? Sad to say, but I'm pretty sure no one of the people I know directly would response to such a call for volunteers. :/ -- Alex
