On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Yeah, and as far as I can see, this primarily happens to originally > > poorly written submissions. But still I'm trying to give some brief > > hints when rejecting submission--eventually people may learn > > something. ;) > > Yes, that's a good thing. I was suggesting you ask for resubmission > more easily (instead of waiting for an answer).
OK :-) > > > > May be we could try to find a few more volunteers? I feel like I'm > > > > the only one actually reviewing projects lately. > > > > > > That's a good idea. > > > > What are our options? May be we can have a link posted under 'Take > > Action' section of the front page of www.gnu.org or something like > > this? > > > > Sad to say, but I'm pretty sure no one of the people I know directly > > would response to such a call for volunteers. :/ > > Well, it's not the first time this happens, alas. > > We post more or less proeminent notices, often at Savannah.gnu.org, > sometimes involving the GNU Volunteers Coordinators. This is a tedious > process because some of the volunteers start helping and are being > taught about project approval, but do not stay for long - and usually > I'm the one who does the teaching ;) > > I'd be in favor of pinging the recently helping people who recently > "disappeared", and ask Dennis if he's still interested in the job > > (http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/savannah-hackers-public/2008-04/msg00013.html) Agreed, it should be easier to reconnect with people who already a bit familiar with the process then teach a bunch of total freshmen (if any appear). ;-) -- Alex
