Follow-up Comment #3, task #10714 (project administration): Sorry, yes .swp files are a mistake and will be removed.
I do not have a problem removing the current license headers (source has never been released) and changing it to an EXPAT or FreeBSD style license or for that matter the WTFPL (Do What The ****bleep**** You Want To Public License). Please note, however, I choose the ISC license based on notes from the following document: A Legal Issues Primer for Open Source and Free Software Projects 3 March 2008 Version 1.5.1 http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2008/foss-primer.html So, does changing it from ISC to something else that is permissive really matter? Let me know your thoughts, and I would be happy to reconsider. Thanks in advance, Mark _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?10714> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/
