Follow-up Comment #4, task #10714 (project administration): -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
2010-10-24 in GNU Savannah task #10714: "Submission of kaso verb conjugation system". > So, does changing it from ISC to something else that is permissive > really matter? Let me know your thoughts, and I would be happy to > reconsider. The possible problem with the ISC license is it may be interpreted as being nonfree because of it wording, as explained in http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#ISC. The document you referred seems to talk about permissive licenses in general without specific bias towards the ISC license or something else. Is there a particular reason because you chose the ISC license instead of another permissive license?. I'm asking you to change to a similar, but clearly worded license just to avoid unlikley but still possible misunderstanding according to the GNU page comment about the ISC license. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEAREIAAYFAkzHmLsACgkQZ4DA0TLic4honACfa4MBdkmMEBFifbkXivf6FPmr eHsAn23m7lFhwDdQiLbGVvi4ArdKWODS =jD86 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?10714> _______________________________________________ Mensaje enviado vía/por Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/
