Update of task #14071 (project administration):
Status: In Progress => Wait reply
_______________________________________________________
Follow-up Comment #1:
Ali,
Thanks a lot for this submission.
A few observations for you:
* I think preferred terminology is "X11 license" rather than "MIT license" [1]
[2]
* Please ensure that GPLv3 is applied correctly [3]; in particular, please
make sure there is a suitable copyright header in each source file and that
the notice references the file that contains the full license
I think a facility for people to encrypt files through a simple
interface is a great idea. But looking at things from an alternative
perspective: could something similar be achieved through a simplifying
front-end to gpg? Maybe something like that already exists, I don't know.
Something to think about, anyway.
Please amend as above and upload a revised tarball. I will then be happy to
review the submission again.
[1] https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html.en#X11License
[2] http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:X11
[3] http://gplv3.fsf.org/wiki/index.php/Howto
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?14071>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
