Follow-up Comment #33, task #14529 (project administration): Thank you; this is the next pass.
These files don't seem relevant for a distribution: ./base/tasklets/.tasklets.o.d ./base/ipc/netrpc/.netrpc.o.d ./base/ipc/sem/.sem.o.d ./base/ipc/bits/.bits.o.d ./base/ipc/msg/.msg.o.d ./base/ipc/mbx/.mbx.o.d ./base/ipc/shm/.shm.o.d ./base/ipc/tbx/.tbx.o.d ./base/ipc/fifos/.fifos.o.d ./base/ipc/mq/.mq.o.d ./base/arch/x86/hal/.hal.o.d ./base/include/.rtai_shm.h.swp ./base/sched/.malloc.o.d ./base/sched/.sched.o.d ./base/sched/.api.o.d ./base/sched/.signal.o.d ./base/sched/.sys.o.d ./base/wd/.wd.o.d ./addons/drivers/serial/.serial.o.d The status of files like rtai-lab/scilab5/RTAI/builder.sce rtai-lab/scilab5/RTAI/etc/RTAI.start rtai-lab/scilab5/RTAI/src/c/builder_c.sce rtai-lab/scilab5/RTAI/src/c/loader.sce rtai-lab/scilab5/RTAI/loader.sce isn't clear; they are plain text, but they say they are generated (from unspecified sources); they have no license notice. rtai-lab/matlab/ptinfo.tlc has no license notice. rtai-lab/scilab5/examples/test.cos has no notices. Is rtai-lab/scicoslab/devices/machine.h autogenerated? It lacks valid notices. rtai-lab/scicoslab/macros/RTAI/rtai4_comedi_encoder.sci lacks notices. rtai-lab/scicoslab/macros/RTAI/gif_icons/* have no notices. The format of rtai-lab/matlab/examples/test.mdl allows comments; the notices should be written in the file itself. In files like rtai-lab/Fl_Scope.cpp the copyright notice isn't very clear: COPYRIGHT (C) 2003 Lorenzo Dozio (...@...) Paolo Mantegazza (...@...) Roberto Bucher (...@...) Peter Brier (...@...) One can see that Lorenzo Dozio is a copyright holder, but what about the rest? Did they contribute anything copyrightable, or are they mentioned to give them credit for something else? This is especially ambiguous because in some other files one can read: COPYRIGHT (C) 2002 Lorenzo Dozio (...@...) Paolo Mantegazza (...@...) Modified 15.1.2003 Roberto Bucher ...@... Modified 15.8.2009 Henrik Slotholt ...@... Did Roberto Bucher and Henrik Slotholt assign copyright to someone else? Are their modifications just uncopyrightable? Every copyright holder should have a separate copyright notice. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?14529> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/