Follow-up Comment #5, task #14618 (project administration): > Sorry for the lacking notice of save/gedalecin.db. I will place the notice in the README.txt file of the same directory
Thank you; please check other files as well (I haven't yet). > My intention was to redistribute them with the licenses specified in the README.txt file in imgs/ have checked the compatibility of these licenses with GPLv3+ in https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html, and I have found a little problem with GPLv2+, so I can modified the license to GPLv3+ in README.txt. I'd like to clarify two points: * why every actual license may be switched to the GPLv3+ * what requirements of the GPLv3 apply to those files, and how your tarball fulfills them _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?14618> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/
