Follow-up Comment #4, task #14945 (project administration): Hi Ineiev, I thought over again, the ko should be only licensed as GPLv2+ since I include GPLv2-only header files.
However I noticed some expressions in http://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/HowToGetYourProjectApprovedQuickly/ --- Use a license compatible with the GNU GPL, and use the "or any later version" formulation in your license notices. GPLv2+ is compatible with the GNU GPL, and I use the "or any later version" formulation. --- GNU GPL-compatible license: your license should be listed as compatible at http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html. I mean all parts of EROFS code can be used for later GPLv3+ use, except for Linux Kernel Header Files( that is not the part of my project, too ). I think no violation on expressions above... Thanks, _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?14945> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
