Follow-up Comment #3, task #15227 (project administration): > Source files should now contain copyright and license notices.
All files should contain them, not just "source files". What about giving the GNU Project due credit? Also, please include an exact copy of the GPL from gnu.org (in your case, https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.txt), without re-wrapping the lines. > Which of the dependencies is GPL incompatible? EPL-1.0 is GPL-incompatible; if this is just a compiler, it shouldn't affect the licensing of your code, but you should make sure it doesn't. > I thought the Java platform was no longer a problem for the GPL I'm not an expert in Java, please take a look at https://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/JavaIssues/ (if that page is outdated, please suggest updates on savannah-hackers-pub...@gnu.org). _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?15227> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.nongnu.org/
