David Baelde a écrit : > I don't think you can get anything precise from icecast. Still > imprecise, you can play with harbor's buffer: > input.harbor(buffer=80.,...). A little less should be better actually, > since other buffers come into play in the pipeline, before and after > liquidsoap. > I forgot to tell you that this is the solution we use and it works well with a buffer of 82.
We just made our first shoutcasts with the delay and the results are very good. We need more tests to be sure. The only problem is we pray that the source will not be disconnected because if we reconnect immediately, we lost the sync. In this case, we have to wait 82 seconds to reconnect. OK, the shoutcast is cut but it's not dramatical. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Savonet-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users
