Hi,
Thanks for the replies! I will test again the end of the week.
Maybe a sugesstion to add these comments to the manual.
grts, Cees
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 1:21 AM, David Baelde <david.bae...@gmail.com>wrote:
> 4 seconds of buffer seem pretty high. I'd imagine that the catchup
> plays a role here: if liquidsoap gets late, oss probably drops some
> data (ring buffer too small), and when liquidsoap tries to catchup by
> going super fast, oss either blocks him, or feed random data.
>
> The conclusion is what Romain said: liquidsoap should not attempt to
> clock OSS. Currently, it's root.sync=false, but soon the oss input
> will be able to say: I have my own clock, don't try to rule me. It
> won't make a big difference when you work with a buffer to work as the
> interface of two clocks (except more control on the behavior of that
> buffer) but sometimes it'll allow you to work with only OSS clocking a
> full liq setup.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Savonet-users mailing list
> Savonet-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Savonet-users mailing list
Savonet-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users
