As discussed on IRC, there may be a problem with the sky() operator,
which is a complex use of filters, splitting the source into 3
different one, applying different compressions and merging them back
using add().

As a temporary work around, I proposed to lookup if there were any
LADSPA plugins that would do the job.

Romain

Le 28 juin 2011 14:30, Kerozen <[email protected]> a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I finally found out what was causing troubles.
>
> As of now and with build 8237, I can't get fallback.skip to work correctly
> if the second source uses sky() sound processing.
> Neither my first script work (the one with two fallback.skip in a row), nor
> the second one (the one with a fallback.skip between a normal fallback and
> my playlist).
> The input= source can be processed by sky with no trouble, but if the
> unlabeled source is processed with sky() at any level in the script, it'll
> take priority over the input= source no matter what, and never let
> fallback.skip switch to the input= source.
>
> The problem does not happen when using nrj() processing instead, and normal
> fallbacks all work perfect, even when using sky().
>
> The problem really only appears when the playlist gets processed by sky() at
> any level AND then we're using fallback.skip to switch between live and
> (sky-processed) playlist.
>
> Any idea ?
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 5:57 PM, David Baelde <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> 2011/6/26 Kerozen <[email protected]>:
>> > In that second script, I expect sky to start from scratch each time
>> > liquidsoap switches between live and playlist. This means : new attack,
>> > no
>> > compression during the first milliseconds etc. Although sky() is doing a
>> > good job overall when starting, I still don't think this is the most
>> > graceful way to use it.
>>
>> If you want sound processing to happen all the time (which wastes some
>> CPU, but might avoid some initialization problems) then you can branch
>> your processed live1 to an output.dummy in parallel to branching it to
>> that fallback with live2.
>>
>> Have fun,
>> --
>> David
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
> Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
> threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
> _______________________________________________
> Savonet-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security 
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes 
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
Savonet-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users

Reply via email to