Hi Fabio, I'm glad you solved your earlier issue.
2011/9/6 Fábio Costa <[email protected]>: > switch( > track_sensitive=false, > single=[true,false], > [({9h33-10h},firula),({true},musica)] > ) > The two tracks kind of superpose Yes, it must sound ugly. But that's kind of normal: the single mode forbids playing the same child twice in a row. Now, when track_sensitive=true, "twice in a row" means "two tracks in a row". The problem is that with track_sensitive=false, "twice in a row" naturally means "two samples in a row". So you hear one sample of firula, then one of musica, then it's possible to play one sample of firula again, and so on. Of course, this is never wanted... we could try to make the single mode track sensitive even in a track insensitive switch. I don't know if this will be tricky or not. What I know is that we have little time, and it doesn't sound like a top priority. Do you really need the single mode here? Thanks for the feedback, -- David ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses from deploying virtual desktops? How do next-generation virtual desktops provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/ _______________________________________________ Savonet-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users
