I can find a way to use another method maybe with delay.
Thanks
Em 8 de setembro de 2011 17:26, David Baelde
<[email protected]>escreveu:
> Hi Fabio,
>
> I'm glad you solved your earlier issue.
>
> 2011/9/6 Fábio Costa <[email protected]>:
> > switch(
> > track_sensitive=false,
> > single=[true,false],
> > [({9h33-10h},firula),({true},musica)]
> > )
> > The two tracks kind of superpose
>
> Yes, it must sound ugly. But that's kind of normal: the single mode
> forbids playing the same child twice in a row. Now, when
> track_sensitive=true, "twice in a row" means "two tracks in a row".
> The problem is that with track_sensitive=false, "twice in a row"
> naturally means "two samples in a row". So you hear one sample of
> firula, then one of musica, then it's possible to play one sample of
> firula again, and so on.
>
> Of course, this is never wanted... we could try to make the single
> mode track sensitive even in a track insensitive switch. I don't know
> if this will be tricky or not. What I know is that we have little
> time, and it doesn't sound like a top priority. Do you really need the
> single mode here?
>
> Thanks for the feedback,
> --
> David
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop
What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses
from deploying virtual desktops? How do next-generation virtual desktops
provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable
virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/
_______________________________________________
Savonet-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users
