Le 01/12/2011 05:22, Romain Beauxis a écrit : > Hi Martin, > > 2011/11/30 Martin Hamant<[email protected]>: >> >> Le 30/11/2011 10:19, David Baelde a écrit : >>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Martin Hamant<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> The MP3 file is the one encoded thru audacity / liblame (128kbit/s / >>>> stéréo) >>>> directly from the original lossless source. >>>> In the WAV file (44.1k/16b) I have recorded the LS 128kbit/s output stream >>>> (so, thru IceCast and played with foobar2000) >>> No time right now (and no sound while at the office) but for a better >>> test, please try with a liquidsoap file output, not through icecast. >>> >>> David >> Here is the file which contains the two MP3 files to compare. >> http://rvbnd1.1fichier.com/ >> >> Same result.... This is very weird. > Thanks for your efforts. > > It is probably this time when I am going to realize that my hearing > has suffered but I have very hard time noticing the artefacts you > mention in the file encoded by liquidsap.. Could you further elaborate > on them..? Yes. This is audible especially on the piano. To help you hearing what I mean, I have opened the two files in audacity and inverted phase on one, the result (below) is somehow the difference that "you should hear". It's a sort of tremolo, which is typical to MP3 compression but that I can hear much more in the LS's version. The LS one somehow "hears" like a MP3 with a lower bitrate !?
the file http://atdl2q.1fichier.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ Savonet-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users
