Le 6 février 2012 07:21, <[email protected]> a écrit : > Hello,
Hi Thomas! > I am in a situation where I need many input.harbors. > Which is better : > > - Have many harbors in one liq script ? > - Have few (maybe even down to one) harbors but many liq scripts ? The only difference I can think of is related to CPU load and multi-core usage. With several processes, you take advantage of all the cores right away. With a single script, you may have to use clocks to achieve that. > Also, I am dealing with mono streams exclusively, but had to convert my > source to stereo using audio_to_stereo before passing it to output.file > (which does not seem to accept mono sources). As I may have lots of streams > being output to files at the same time, I'd like to know if audio_to_stereo > uses a lot of processing power ? audio_to_stereo may not use too much CPU. However, output.file (and all outputs using encoders) should support mono streams: output.file(%mp3(mono), ...) Or output.file(%mp3(channels=1), ...) Romain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d _______________________________________________ Savonet-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users
