On 07 Feb 2012, at 02:06, Romain Beauxis wrote: > Le 6 février 2012 07:21, <[email protected]> a écrit : >> Hello, > > Hi Thomas! > >> I am in a situation where I need many input.harbors. >> Which is better : >> >> - Have many harbors in one liq script ? >> - Have few (maybe even down to one) harbors but many liq scripts ? > > The only difference I can think of is related to CPU load and > multi-core usage. With several processes, you take advantage of all > the cores right away. With a single script, you may have to use clocks > to achieve that.
ok, thanks! > >> Also, I am dealing with mono streams exclusively, but had to convert my >> source to stereo using audio_to_stereo before passing it to output.file >> (which does not seem to accept mono sources). As I may have lots of streams >> being output to files at the same time, I'd like to know if audio_to_stereo >> uses a lot of processing power ? > > audio_to_stereo may not use too much CPU. However, output.file (and > all outputs using encoders) should support mono streams: > output.file(%mp3(mono), ...) > Or > output.file(%mp3(channels=1), …) should have tried that… sorry, and thanks :) > Romain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/ _______________________________________________ Savonet-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users
