Hi Romain, I'm not sure what you mean by consider other name than liq_fade_*. We use those fields to control individual fade in/out. Can you show me an example?
Thanks! Sent from my iPhone On 2012-03-12, at 7:41 PM, Romain Beauxis <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > 2012/3/12 James Moon <[email protected]>: >> Any update on this?? > > Not yet. As for liquidsoap, we need to decide wether we fix the > problem by ignoring medata override for fade parameters in > fade.initial/final or accept them but add the override parameter there > too. I think we should go with the former. > > As for your situation, have your considered the possibility of using a > different metadata than liq_fade_* in your annotations? > > Romain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d _______________________________________________ Savonet-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users
