Le 18/01/2016 17:57, Romain Beauxis a écrit : > 2016-01-18 10:48 GMT-06:00 Gilou <contact+...@gilouweb.com>: >> >> Le 18/01/2016 17:25, Romain Beauxis a écrit : >>> >>> >>> 2016-01-17 17:14 GMT-06:00 Gilou <contact+...@gilouweb.com >>> <mailto:contact%2b...@gilouweb.com>>: >>>> >>>> Le 13/01/2016 00:56, Romain Beauxis a écrit : >>>>> Dear all, >>>>> >>>>> This with great pleasure and much thanks for your patience that I am >>>>> glad to announce that liquidsoap 1.2.0 has just been released. >>>>> Changelog is included at the bottom of this email. >>>>> >>>>> This release focuses on getting all the latest and much awaited >>>>> developments and bug fixes out the door. We will be responding to bug >>>>> reports and potential feature requests afterward and may release >>>>> further minor versions as we see fit in the near future. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Hey there, >>>> >>>> It seems the liquidsoap-full repository didn't get its 1.2.0 tag, it >>>> might be helpful to be able to check on it as well for releases :) >>> >>> I was looking at it. It's a bit annoying to do, honestly, >>> liquidsoap-full is too much of a moving target. >>> >>> Do you have a real need for it? Otherwise, you can always download the >>> liquidsoap-full tarball and use it to get released versions or else >>> checkout liquidsoap-full for the latest development code.. >> >> Well, it's easier on a machine not using the new opam thing, or package >> management (well from source) to get ready on a known stable version. >> >> I can do without it, or rely on master for those needs, but it'd be nice >> to be able to target a liq version there too. I can live without it, >> clearly. >> >> Clearly, if opam works nicely and can target a stable version that is a >> seemingly cleaner solution to me. >> >> Use case was: wanting to deploy a liq instance on a new install from >> source, but still targetting a release to gather all the dependencies >> super easily. Think docker or general cloud provisioning. > > Yes, I understand your need and it's absolutely relevant. > > What I was trying to say is that we also published a -full tarball > there: > https://github.com/savonet/liquidsoap/releases/download/1.2.0/liquidsoap-1.2.0-full.tar.bz2 > > Shouldn't that be enough to get all the code you need for a build? >
Definitely, I didn't understand the liq release included -full. That is perfectly fine, and exactly what I was after, thanks ;) Cheers, Gilles ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Savonet-users mailing list Savonet-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users
