Good to know, thanks. I've added a ticket for this:
https://github.com/savonet/liquidsoap/issues/2019

Le sam. 9 oct. 2021 à 08:49, Gilles Pietri <contact+...@gilouweb.com> a
écrit :

> Le 08/10/2021 à 15:38, Romain Beauxis a écrit :
> > Hi!
> >
> > I've noticed it. There are a bunch of initialization stuff that get
> > triggered implicitly now and that could be the source.
> >
> > Considering that it does not seem to happen on docker, I'd suggest it
> > might be related to some hardware initialization.
> >
> > We use `libavdevice` now and I think it gets automatically initialized,
> > this is probably where this comes from.
> >
> > Do you think that this should be considered an issue?
>
> Hi,
>
> I don't think it's an issue, and it is even less of an issue to me as my
> VMs don't suffer from it, as I have a lot less stuff installed there (or
> use docker). Though if I'm missing a way to not let liq load say ladspa
> plugin through a setting, let me know, as in one scenario, this could
> help (and liq taking more than 1s to load is usually a symptom I don't
> ignore :P)
>
> However, I don't think it's hardware bound, as on a VM with no soundcard
> I can reproduce it, by installing the LSP plugin suite.
> root@radio-v6:~# time liquidsoap -h x
> Plugin not found!
>
> real    0m1.153s
> user    0m0.809s
> sys     0m0.053s
>
> after installing lsp-plugins-ladspa
>
> # time liquidsoap -h x
> Plugin not found!
>
> real    0m4.500s
> user    0m3.496s
> sys     0m0.087s
>
> And I can reproduce it right away in docker, so containers are not
> immune either. And I agree it's more of a ladspa/lsp issue, but well,
> maybe we can blacklist/whitelist some. But that is not a blocking issue
> nor an outstanding one.
>
> Cheers
> Gilou
>
>
>
> > -- Romain
> >
> > Le jeu. 7 oct. 2021 à 05:13, Gilles Pietri <contact+...@gilouweb.com
> > <mailto:contact%2b...@gilouweb.com>> a écrit :
> >
> >     Le 07/10/2021 à 11:40, Gilles Pietri a écrit :
> >      > Hi,
> >      >
> >      > As I'm migrating v1.4 stuff to v2.0, it's expected that I often
> use
> >      > liquidsoap -h xx to check on new syntax... And it's quite slow,
> >     on my
> >      > machine and my test env. I use the .deb provided by the ci @
> github.
> >
> >     Info about platform was in the title, but wrong. On a freshly
> installed
> >     debian, I don't have that issue. So I'm guessing there is a package
> >     installed on ubuntu that leads to this.
> >
> >     I did run it on a laptop that does a lot of sound related stuff, and
> >     it's the worst there. Maybe ladspa plugns are the culprit… I'll
> >     investigate more later.
> >
> >     I ran strace -tt liquidsoap --version result (after removing frei0r
> >     plugins, that I don't use), which seems to agree with the ladspa
> lookup
> >     taking up to 1s.
> >
> >     $ dpkg --list | grep ^ii  | grep -i 'ladspa' | awk '{ print $2 }'
> >     ladspa-sdk
> >     lsp-plugins-ladspa
> >     rubberband-ladspa
> >     swh-plugins
> >     tap-plugins
> >     zam-plugins
> >
> >
> >     This is not a blocking issue, but may be a symptom for some
> >     bloated-ness, and maybe it'd be good to be able to avoid loading all
> >     the
> >     stuff when it's not needed (or maybe I'll have to recompile it to
> avoid
> >     it, but that would be sad, just to read the docs or check syntax :P)
> >
> >
> >     Cheers,
> >     Gilou
> >
> >
> >
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     Savonet-users mailing list
> >     Savonet-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> >     <mailto:Savonet-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> >     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users
> >     <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users>
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Savonet-users mailing list
> > Savonet-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users
> >
>
> --
> Gilles Pietri
> 29 avenue de la Libération, F-44400 Rezé
> 0634745199
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Savonet-users mailing list
> Savonet-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users
>
_______________________________________________
Savonet-users mailing list
Savonet-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users

Reply via email to