On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:58:10 +0100, Christopher Roy Bratusek wrote: > Well what I've got in mind is something like: > > ;; exec true when NumLock is OFF > KP_Left '(system "true &") > > ;; exec true when NumLock is ON > N-KP_Left '(system "true &")
Yes, it'll be great. (Thanks for explanation I omitted :) I meant that someone else may like NumLock gets ignored, so that both KP_Left and NumLock-KP_Left are treated as "KP_Left". (This is the current Sawfish.) Option to switch between these two is easy, and I'll do it if NumLock support is done. Cheers, Teika (Teika kazura)
