Am Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:22:29 +0900 (JST) schrieb Teika Kazura <[email protected]>:
> > > On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:58:10 +0100, Christopher Roy Bratusek wrote: > > Well what I've got in mind is something like: > > > > ;; exec true when NumLock is OFF > > KP_Left '(system "true &") > > > > ;; exec true when NumLock is ON > > N-KP_Left '(system "true &") > > Yes, it'll be great. (Thanks for explanation I omitted :) I meant that > someone else may like NumLock gets ignored, so that both KP_Left and > NumLock-KP_Left are treated as "KP_Left". (This is the current > Sawfish.) X-KP_Left ? or NI-KP_Left ? > Option to switch between these two is easy, and I'll do it if NumLock > support is done. > > Cheers, > Teika (Teika kazura) >
