> However, I think it would still be interesting to put Sawfish > into Fedora (and EPEL).
Yes, it would. If you have extra time please try to do it. > I have briefly looked into the sawfish .spec file, and there > is a minor flaw which my own .spec file does not have: > > Requires: librep >= 0.91.0, rep-gtk >= 0.90.4 > > - apparently, sawfish requires also librep-devel. I just tested it. Sawfish works fine without librep-devel and rep-gtk-devel. Perhaps your version of librep.spec had some file listed to wrong subpackage?
