On 2011-03-31 at 17:23+03 Kim B Heino <[email protected]> wrote: > So... I just added review requests to Fedora bugzilla! Let's see > what happens. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692537 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692541 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692543
Good luck. (Seriously.) I've been a Fedora developer for several years now, and I've been building my own sawfish/librep/rep-gtk packages for even longer than that. (As Michal pointed out, the .spec files that the tarballs contain are usually pretty good.) But the main reason I never attempted to package sawfish for Fedora was that I was afraid that I wouldn't be able to handle most of the bug requests. I'm a sawfish user, not a sawfish developer, and packagers need to have good communication with "upstream". However, if someone else wants to own the packages, I'll be happy to help with packaging issues, as I'm very familiar with RPM specfiles and the Fedora Packaging Guidelines.
