On Sun, 16 Jul 2006, mikeiscool wrote: > On 7/16/06, ljknews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At 3:27 PM -0400 7/15/06, Goertzel Karen wrote: > > > Content-class: urn:content-classes:message > > > Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > > > boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C6A844.D6A28B6B" > > > > > > I've been struggling for a while to synthesise a definition of secure > > >software that is short and sweet, yet accurate and comprehensive. Here's > > >what I've come up with: > > > > > > Secure software is software that remains dependable despite efforts to > > >compromise its dependability. > > > > > > Agree? Disagree? > > > > I disagree about that being bumper-sticker size, and I think we really > > need bumper stickers. > > a better bumper sticker would be something like: > > "secure software is what i write. call me now to find out how!"
"I read your email" jinx.com _______________________________________________ Secure Coding mailing list (SC-L) SC-L@securecoding.org List information, subscriptions, etc - http://krvw.com/mailman/listinfo/sc-l List charter available at - http://www.securecoding.org/list/charter.php
