At 9:44 AM -0400 6/30/08, Kenneth Van Wyk wrote:

> Happy PCI-DSS 6.6 day, everyone.  (Wow, that's a sentence you don't  
> hear often.)
> 
> http://www.internetnews.com/ec-news/article.php/3755916
> 
> In talking with my customers over the past several months, I always  
> find it interesting that the vast majority would sooner have root  
> canal than submit their source code to anyone for external review.   
> I'm betting PCI 6.6 has been a boon for the web application firewall  
> (WAF) world.

The "Note:" at the end of PCI DSS (v1.1) 6.6 talks about
"this method" but typographically seems to apply to both
bullets.  Does anyone know what the authors had in mind ?
-- 
Larry Kilgallen
_______________________________________________
Secure Coding mailing list (SC-L) SC-L@securecoding.org
List information, subscriptions, etc - http://krvw.com/mailman/listinfo/sc-l
List charter available at - http://www.securecoding.org/list/charter.php
SC-L is hosted and moderated by KRvW Associates, LLC (http://www.KRvW.com)
as a free, non-commercial service to the software security community.
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to