This plan seems correct to me.

It is worth considering if we should look into shading Kryo in scalding.
Having this many projects coupled on a version is not great.

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 1:11 PM 'Timur Abishev' via Scalding Development <
[email protected]> wrote:

> We are going to move to Kryo 3.x and 1.0.x Storm API at Twitter. To
> accomplish that we need to migrate: 1) chill-storm to 1.0.x, 2) tormenta to
> storm 1.0.x and chill 0.8.x, 3) scalding to chill 0.8.x and finally 4)
> summingbird to new chill, tormenta and scalding.
>
> Any suggestions/objections about that?
>
> --
> Timur Abishev
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Scalding Development" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Scalding Development" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to