Yeah, that's a good question. In some ways I think SB and Storm sort of
communicate through kryo though right? They share a kryo registrar, it's
how users setup their serialization in both frameworks right?

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:21 PM, P. Oscar Boykin <[email protected]>
wrote:

> This plan seems correct to me.
>
> It is worth considering if we should look into shading Kryo in scalding.
> Having this many projects coupled on a version is not great.
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 1:11 PM 'Timur Abishev' via Scalding Development <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> We are going to move to Kryo 3.x and 1.0.x Storm API at Twitter. To
>> accomplish that we need to migrate: 1) chill-storm to 1.0.x, 2) tormenta to
>> storm 1.0.x and chill 0.8.x, 3) scalding to chill 0.8.x and finally 4)
>> summingbird to new chill, tormenta and scalding.
>>
>> Any suggestions/objections about that?
>>
>> --
>> Timur Abishev
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Scalding Development" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Scalding Development" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 
Alex Levenson
@THISWILLWORK

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Scalding Development" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to