Whoops. Sorry about that, Michael -- got a bit ahead of myself.
On 09/26/2012 01:23 PM, Jeffrey Blank wrote:
The first is mostly fine (ACK), but for the second one I think Michael
should weigh in.
You're adding clause= attributes to existing checks where that has been
specifically identified as Michael's task:
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/scap-security-guide/2012-September/001659.html
If he hasn't gotten to the ones you've added, then maybe he can grant
you an ACK.
On 09/26/2012 10:43 AM, David Smith wrote:
added OCIL checks and clauses
David Smith (2):
added or modified check text, adding OCIL clauses where appropriate
added or modified check text, adding OCIL clauses where appropriate
RHEL6/input/system/accounts/pam.xml | 24 +++++++++++++
RHEL6/input/system/accounts/physical.xml | 28 +++++++++++++++
.../accounts/restrictions/password_expiration.xml | 36 +++++++++++++++----
RHEL6/input/system/accounts/session.xml | 31 ++++++++++++-----
RHEL6/input/system/permissions/files.xml | 20 +++++-----
5 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
_______________________________________________
scap-security-guide mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
_______________________________________________
scap-security-guide mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
--
David Smith
410.854.5757
Commercial Solutions
Global Mitigations Office
National Security Agency
_______________________________________________
scap-security-guide mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
