Thanks Jeff -- you caught that, and I missed it!!! @Dave ack -- but lets see if my recent changes fix this.
On 09/26/2012 01:23 PM, Jeffrey Blank wrote: > The first is mostly fine (ACK), but for the second one I think Michael > should weigh in. > > You're adding clause= attributes to existing checks where that has been > specifically identified as Michael's task: > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/scap-security-guide/2012-September/001659.html > > If he hasn't gotten to the ones you've added, then maybe he can grant > you an ACK. > > > > > On 09/26/2012 10:43 AM, David Smith wrote: >> added OCIL checks and clauses >> >> David Smith (2): >> added or modified check text, adding OCIL clauses where appropriate >> added or modified check text, adding OCIL clauses where appropriate >> >> RHEL6/input/system/accounts/pam.xml | 24 +++++++++++++ >> RHEL6/input/system/accounts/physical.xml | 28 +++++++++++++++ >> .../accounts/restrictions/password_expiration.xml | 36 >> +++++++++++++++---- >> RHEL6/input/system/accounts/session.xml | 31 ++++++++++++----- >> RHEL6/input/system/permissions/files.xml | 20 +++++----- >> 5 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> scap-security-guide mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide > _______________________________________________ > scap-security-guide mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide _______________________________________________ scap-security-guide mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
