Personally, I like the look of option 2, but would go with wording like "Select Security Policy" and "Apply Security Policy". Just my .02.
-- Lee Kinser Solutions Architect Navy & Marine Corps Red Hat Federal 843-868-1024 (Mobile) [email protected] ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Vratislav Podzimek" <[email protected]> > To: "oscap-anaconda-addon" <[email protected]> > Cc: "scap-security-guide" <[email protected]>, > "open-scap-list" <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 4:07:02 AM > Subject: Ignoring SCAP content in the OAA > > Hello everybody, > I'd like to ask you for a favour. In the development cycle of the > release 0.5 of the OSCAP Anaconda Addon, I've added an autodetection of > the SCAP Security Guide content which means that if the > scap-security-guide package is installed in the compose and no other > content is specified in the kickstart file, the addon automatically > loads SSG content. I believe this brings us a big improvement in UX for > testing and finally moves us closer to including the OAA+SSG in the > default composes for next Fedora (and others) release. > However, this also brings the need to allow user changing the content > used by the addon (to switch from autodetected SSG to some different > content) and "not applying" content to the system (to easily turn of the > functionality once it gets included in the default composes). Turns out > it's quite hard to come up with the right widgets and proper labels > (wording) that would explain user what's going on. > The two mockup suggestions I've made so far are: > 1. http://vpodzime.fedorapeople.org/OAA_control_buttons.png > 2. http://vpodzime.fedorapeople.org/OAA_control_buttons2.png > > The 1. uses a GtkToggleButton that can be pushed down and stays in that > state and I think it should have some better wording catching the > process -- something like "Applying security rules"/"Ignoring security > rules" -- that would change when the button is toggled. > > The 2. uses a switch which relies on the related label next to it and > again even in this case, the right wording of the label is the key, I > think. What about "Apply security rules"? > > Please keep in mind the fact, that we would like this screen to be shown > even to unexperienced users who have no idea about SCAP and the special > terms/keywords it uses. We don't want to confuse users and we want to > give them an easy way to opt out. > > Any suggestions welcome! I'd like to release OAA 0.5 by the end of this > week, so it will come with the best layout and wording we will be able > to come up till that time. > > Thanks, > > -- > Vratislav Podzimek > > Anaconda Rider | Red Hat, Inc. | Brno - Czech Republic > > _______________________________________________ > scap-security-guide mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide > _______________________________________________ scap-security-guide mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
