On Tuesday, September 02, 2014 11:43:14 AM Martin Preisler wrote: > > > So instead I decided to explicitly say how many rules failed or were > > > inconclusive. > > > > > > For example: > > > "The target system did not satisfy conditions of 131 rules! Furthermore, > > > the results of 2 rules were inconclusive. Please review rule results > > > and consider applying remediation." > > > > Inconclusive is a word that I would not use. It prejudices the results by > > indicating that something may or may not be wrong and it can't really > > tell. > > That is exactly the case. It's not prejudice, it's fact.
Apologies. I think I misread the output. For those two items I think you are right. -Steve -- SCAP Security Guide mailing list scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide https://github.com/OpenSCAP/scap-security-guide/
