----- Original Message ----- > From: "Shawn Wells" <sh...@redhat.com> > To: scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org > Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2014 6:12:20 AM > Subject: Re: Best ways to say this system is not compliant > > On 9/3/14, 7:38 AM, Martin Preisler wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> > From: "Shawn Wells" <sh...@redhat.com> > >> > To: scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org > >> > Sent: Tuesday, September 2, 2014 7:54:15 PM > >> > Subject: Re: Best ways to say this system is not compliant > >> > > >> > [snip] > >> > > >> > Would it be possible to add a tooltip/hover so that when people mouse > >> > over the "Rule Overview" check boxes they would see these definitions? > >> > > >> > Many find the differences between notchecked, notselected, and > >> > notapplicable confusing... and really, to someone who hasn't read the > >> > xccdf spec, that's entirely understandable. > > We have tooltips over the rule results themselves but you are right that > > having them in the box in Rule Overview would be better. > > > > I'll make a patch. > > Thanks! > > Absolutely no rush or anything: could you re-spin the samples off your > fedorapeople page? It'd be great to see how all these changes have been > incorporated (the code presents some insight, but it's funner to play > around on the html page).
Done -> https://mpreisle.fedorapeople.org/openscap/1.1.0_xslt/ > btw - I was at a customer site today who made a comment that they've > been watching this thread and really loving where the report is heading. > these design improvements are really going far to show responsiveness to > the user community, and generally making OpenSCAP reports badass :) Cool. That's nice to hear. -- Martin Preisler -- SCAP Security Guide mailing list scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide https://github.com/OpenSCAP/scap-security-guide/
