Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 21:48:57 +0200 (EET) From: Vitaly Magerya <[email protected]>
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010, Alex Shinn wrote: > The intent was that `current-posix-seconds' can be easily > implemented in terms of `current-tai-seconds'. So, `current-posix-seconds' are seconds since POSIX epoch, not POSIX time as you initially phrased it? In this case, I agree. My understanding of the present proposals is: (current-posix-second) evaluates to the number of SI seconds that have elapsed since 1972-01-01T00:00:00Z, plus 6307200, minus the number of those seconds that were labelled as leap seconds in UTC. (seconds-since-utc-epoch) evaluates to the number of SI seconds that have elapsed since 1972-01-01T00:00:00Z. (current-tai-seconds) is (+ k (seconds-since-utc-epoch)) for some constant k that I do not know. _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
