Andy Wingo scripsit: > The `let' documentation denotes BODY as "a sequence of one or more > expressions". This does not permit definitions. > > Similarly for letrec and letrec*.
Fixed. > Perhaps also there should be clarity > regarding the validity of the following program: > > (let* ((x 1) > (x (+ x 1))) > x) It's fairly silly, but not illegal. -- John Cowan http://ccil.org/~cowan [email protected] SAXParserFactory [is] a hideous, evil monstrosity of a class that should be hung, shot, beheaded, drawn and quartered, burned at the stake, buried in unconsecrated ground, dug up, cremated, and the ashes tossed in the Tiber while the complete cast of Wicked sings "Ding dong, the witch is dead." --Elliotte Rusty Harold on xml-dev _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
