On Thu, 19 May 2011 17:29:26 -0400, Andy Wingo <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu 19 May 2011 19:18, John Cowan <[email protected]> writes: > >>> Perhaps also there should be clarity >>> regarding the validity of the following program: >>> >>> (let* ((x 1) >>> (x (+ x 1))) >>> x) >> >> It's fairly silly, but not illegal. > > Right, but the language for `let' says that all identifiers should be > distinct, and the language for `let*' simply says that it's like `let' > but in-order. Not a major point, and it could go unmentioned, but it is > ambiguous language. Filed ticket #187. Aaron W. Hsu -- Programming is just another word for the lost art of thinking. _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
