On Fri 20 May 2011 07:17, Alex Shinn <[email protected]> writes: >> Funally the result of invoking a continuation captured at the toplevel >> is not mentioned. On purpose? > > Yes. Have you ever seen a sane proposal for specifying > this that all implementations could easily support?! :O
No :) Andy -- http://wingolog.org/ _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
