Alex Shinn scripsit: > There are some very uncommon semantics such as those supported by SCM, > where syntax can retroactively modify preceding definitions, which are > technically allowed in R5RS. We need very strong motivation to break > backwards compatibility with R5RS (though this may be such a case).
Except for SCM, all the REPL semantics are in fact the same: references to variables aren't inlined, syntax forms are inlined (so they must be defined before use and redefinition is not retroactive). We have a ticket for REPL semantics already. -- John Cowan [email protected] "You need a change: try Canada" "You need a change: try China" --fortune cookies opened by a couple that I know _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
