On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Denis Washington <[email protected]> wrote:
> Am 31.08.2011 00:43, schrieb Arthur A. Gleckler: > > "r7rs-big" and "r7rs-small" are perfectly good names. > > In my opinion, they are awful. What should the reports be named, then? > "The Small Report on [...] Scheme" and "The Big Report on [...] Scheme"? > Sounds like they are differently detailed reports on the same thing, > which is clearly not the case. > > What about something like R6RS naming: "Report on the Scheme Core Language" and "Report on the Scheme Standard Libraries" ? This naming highlights the fact of a core language (WG1) with optional libraries (WG2). Best regards, -- Emmanuel
_______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
