On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Vincent Manis <[email protected]> wrote:
> > What about something like R6RS naming: "Report on the Scheme Core
> Language" and "Report on the Scheme Standard Libraries" ? This naming
> highlights the fact of a core language (WG1) with optional libraries (WG2).
>
>
> I would slightly prefer `(Revised^7) Report on the {Core,Extended} Scheme
> Language', because (a) they sound slightly more euphonious (to my tin ear),
> and (b) calling WG2 the `Extended Scheme Language' seems more in harmony
> with the WG2 charter (`Working group 2 will develop specifications,
> documents, and proofs of practical implementability for a language that
> embodies the essential character of Scheme...'). WG2's product can be
> `Extended Scheme' even if it specifies a set of libraries.
>
Good proposal, Thanks for fixing my wordings.
Best regards,
--
Emmanuel
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
