Vincent Manis scripsit: > I'd therefore suggest adding a procedure named make-eof-object or some such, > and defined to return one of the set of eof objects for the implementation.
Ticket #337 filed. > 2. I'm not sure I understand the difference between `input port' > and `port capable of doing input operations'. The draft offers > input-port? and output-port? that are true if the argument is an > input (or output port). Yet close-input-port and close-output-port > are clearly defined to shut down the input or output side of a port, > leaving the other side still functioning, and explicitly work on things > that are not input (or output) ports. There isn't intended to be a difference. Editorial ticket #338 filed. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan [email protected] "After all, would you consider a man without honor wealthy, even if his Dinar laid end to end would reach from here to the Temple of Toplat?" "No, I wouldn't", the beggar replied. "Why is that?" the Master asked. "A Dinar doesn't go very far these days, Master. --Kehlog Albran Besides, the Temple of Toplat is across the street." The Profit _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
