One additional editorial point about eof objects. This is, I think, the only 
type mentioned in the Report that is not listed in section 3.2. I would suggest 
adding at the bottom, wording such as `In addition, there is an 
implementation-defined set of end-of-file objects, which satisfy the predicate 
eof-object?. This type is not required to be disjoint from any other type, 
provided that the constraints specified by the input procedures that may return 
such objects are met.' 

-- vincent
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports

Reply via email to