> R5RS doesn't have such permission - it has permission > to return #f when the string has _any_ radix prefix, and > in a number of other cases related to incomplete numeric > towers. What we explicitly voted on is that these must > be unified with `read` behavior. I don't think this is an > unintended consequence.
What will (string->number "#x10" 8) return? I think the issue is with ambiguity. Cheers leppie -- http://codeplex.com/IronScheme http://xacc.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
