Alex Shinn scripsit: > > What will (string->number "#x10" 8) return? > > > > I think the issue is with ambiguity. > > That would be an argument for returning #false > on mis-matched radixes as John suggested,
I made no such suggestion, nor any reference to `string->number` with a second argument. The value of the expression (string->number "0x10" 8) is unquestionably 16. -- Note that nobody these days would clamor for fundamental laws John Cowan of *the theory of kangaroos*, showing why pseudo-kangaroos are [email protected] physically, logically, metaphysically impossible. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Kangaroos are wonderful, but not *that* wonderful. --Dan Dennett on zombies _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
