Joost 't Hart wrote:
On 09/01/2010 06:11 PM, Fulvio wrote:

Hi,

There are some aspects that i want to change in scid:

In the Tree Window:
1) I want to change the the performance statistic. Actually it is just a
lookout in a table based on the opponents elo average, i want to use the
fide formula for the performance calculation and express the result as
+/- over the AvElo (es instead of the actual AvElo 2700 Perf 2695 i'll
prefer AvElo 2700 Perf -5)

Calculation is fine for me; I do not share your preference for displaying, which I feel is rather unusual.

Just to clarify my idea: the actual perfomance calculation don't take in consideration the average elo of the player.
If a 2700 player beats a 2500 player you get a performance of 3499 (!?)
If a 2000 player beats a 2500 player you get a perfomance of 3499

I remember Nunn saying in "Secret of Practical Chess" that the perfomance is significative only compared to the average elo, and i argree. If there is a line with AvElo 2500 and Perf 2600 i can consider it a very good line.
Another line with AvElo 2700 and Perf 2650 is to be considered inferior.

What i'm thinking about is calculating the FIDE expected result { 1 / ( 1 + pow10((oppElo - elo) /400.0)) }, calculate the perfomance accordingly and show the difference from the AvElo. This way a + line is a good line (players who played that move performed above their elo) and minus line are dubious (they lose elo points).


For browsing-only: What is your problem with the browse windows you can produce via Right-Click/Browse from the Game List? I use them very often.
Too small.
Thanks, for you opinions.
Bye, Fulvio
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:

Show off your parallel programming skills.
Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
_______________________________________________
Scid-users mailing list
Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users

Reply via email to