pa...@pbratholm.dk wrote:
I think the present behaviour is fine in this regard, and I don't think I
would opt to use a "filter off" switch very much.
I believe that the tree window change the filter only for a technical
reason: when you click on the best games button it search only on the
filtered games.
What I'm wondering is there a pratical use for some users?
In which case do you find useful that the filter is automatically
(setting the filter manually requires only 2 clicks) set on the actual
board position (overwriting your precedent filter)?
Well, that is one point that I certainly think should be changed. My
preferences would be to order the games after Year as first priority and
after strongest players ratings as second, leaving average rating down on
third level in the sorting process.
That way the most "modern" approach comes up on top - which is of course
also true if some 1400 fellow totally mishandled the position two weeks
ago (but then that would be rather obvious).
for example:
Game1: White_elo 2700 - Black_elo 2500 - year 2007
Game2: White_elo 2600 - Black_elo 2550 - year 2010
Game3: White_elo 2400 - Balck_elo 2400 - year 2010
I'm thinking about something like this:
(white_elo + black_elo) -penalty_year -penalty_elo_diff
That will give me an order of game2 - game1 - game3
Bye, Fulvio
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
Show off your parallel programming skills.
Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
_______________________________________________
Scid-users mailing list
Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
