Hi, Another one.
Is exporting to plain HTML (without Javascript, I mean) still in use? If not, we could kill it... Next, exporting to plain HTML offers the user the choice of two sorts of B/W gif bitmaps, being "bitmaps" and "bitmaps2". Is there any particular reason why these are different bitmaps than the colourful mini ones that we use with HTML/Javascript? Maybe for printing, but if none, we could kill these... Or do they serve yet another purpose in the application? Next, why is there a choice between "bitmaps" (ugly) and "bitmaps2" (decent)? If no true reason but "legacy", I suggest will kill the ugly ones. This would also resolve the "bitmaps" name clash in your html export directory that arises because the bitmaps folder for the HTML/Javascript export has the same name... Cheers, Joost. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database without downtime or disruption http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl _______________________________________________ Scid-users mailing list Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users