Hi,

Another one.

Is exporting to plain HTML (without Javascript, I mean) still in use?

If not, we could kill it...

Next, exporting to plain HTML offers the user the choice of two sorts of 
B/W gif bitmaps, being "bitmaps" and "bitmaps2".

Is there any particular reason why these are different bitmaps than the 
colourful mini ones that we use with HTML/Javascript?

Maybe for printing, but if none, we could kill these... Or do they serve 
yet another purpose in the application?

Next, why is there a choice between "bitmaps" (ugly) and "bitmaps2" 
(decent)?

If no true reason but "legacy", I suggest will kill the ugly ones. This 
would also resolve the "bitmaps" name clash in your html export 
directory that arises because the bitmaps folder for the HTML/Javascript 
export has the same name...

Cheers,
Joost.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers
to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, 
should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database 
without downtime or disruption
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl
_______________________________________________
Scid-users mailing list
Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users

Reply via email to