On 15/03/13 18:17, Henk van Lingen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:01:34AM +0100, Fulvio wrote:
>
>> - if the merge is technically too complicated, having both live
>> separated is good.
>> - deleting a free project without reason is bad.
>
> Hi Fulvio,
>
> Having various almost the same projects (scid, scidvspc, scidb, ...)
> is bad. Users don't understand and don't know what to choose. And it
> scatters dev-talent.

scidb claims to be a redevelopment. I'd leave it alone.

>
> Several people on this list already asked what you mean by 'deleting
> the project'. There are lots of free software projects where version
> Y is a complete rewrite of version X. What's the problem with freezing

Linux 2.0, 2.2 and 2.4 were pretty much rewritten versions of prior 
linux kernels. as better algorithms are developed, older code is 
removed. Sometimes there are competing designs for the same feature: I 
think IBM came second in LVM for example. Faster CPUs and more CPUS in 
the same system have required significant rewriting. More RAM required 
new memory management designs, presumably removing entirely older code.

> scid 4.3, let the source-tree exist, and start with 4.9 with different
> sources?
>
> Cheers,

If SCID has fewer changes than scidvspc since the fork, and since it 
seems Steven has already taken the best bits, there shouldn't be a lot 
more to be done.

And anyone who's hacked on files in either should make sure they have 
their own copyright claims in them. If you didn't originate a file you 
changed, perhaps you should add other copyright claims too? If you don't 
know the prior authors, it's a little trickier, but perhaps attribute it 
to "the scid project?"



-- 
Santa

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
_______________________________________________
Scid-users mailing list
Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users

Reply via email to