The following article was selected from the Internet Edition
of the Chicago Tribune. To visit the site, point your browser
to http://chicagotribune.com/. 
----------- Chicago Tribune Article Forwarding----------------


Article forwarded by: Cayata Dixon

Return e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Article URL:  
http://chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/commentary/article/0,2669,SAV-0106060145,FF.html


---Forwarded article----------------
Teachers voted to regain respect

By Deborah Lynch-Walsh. Deborah Lynch-Walsh is the president-elect of the Chicago 
Teachers Union.

  The recent Chicago Teachers Union election provided Chicago public
school teachers with an opportunity to send a message that change is
needed among their leadership.

While there have been some positive results over the past few years in
reforming and improving schools--new funds for capital development,
for example--the recent majority vote by teachers to be represented by
candidates of the CTU's ProActive Chicago Teachers & School Employees
(PACT) caucus is a true mandate for increased teacher respect, and the
involvement of professional teachers in the decision-making process to
improve our schools.

    Why is respect an issue? For one thing, nothing has been done to
fight the erroneous perception that teachers are the problem in the
failure of students to achieve greater academic success. One proposed
solution to the problem of low reading scores--scripted classroom
interaction, a "reform" that is designed to teacher-proof classroom
instruction--is an example of school reform being done to teachers
instead of with teachers. Experts agree the most successful reform
models are implemented by teachers who take ownership of the reform
because it fits their school's circumstances.

Teachers should be regarded as professionals who understand their job
and, when given the proper recognition and resources, can do it right.
The fallout from the numerous "flavor of the week" reforms that have
been forced on teachers--including reconstitution, remediation,
intervention, re-engineering and probation--is that good teachers are
leaving Chicago's schools and new teachers are choosing to teach in
suburban schools. As professionals in their field, teachers must have
a greater voice in the changes that take place in their classrooms.

After more than a decade of school reform efforts, we see that some
tactics have worked very well, others not at all. It is now time to
move away from experiments in reform that have provided few positive
results, and toward those efforts that have been proven to be
effective. Among the most important issues at hand as we chart a
course for the next phase of reform are the following:

- Class size. Too many students, especially in the early elementary
grades and in impoverished neighborhood schools, are being taught in
overcrowded conditions. A teacher facing a classroom of 35 students,
many of whom arrive at school without basic learning skills or even a
decent breakfast, simply cannot meet the academic needs of every
student. More funding is needed now to build more classrooms and hire
more teachers, especially in the lowest elementary grades and in the
poorest neighborhoods.

All of the research points to the fact that teachers are more
effective teaching to classes of 20-25 students. The biggest
beneficiaries of smaller class sizes are impoverished children, who
comprise 85 percent of Chicago's public school students.

- Good teachers. Teacher quality is the best predictor of student
achievement. Research shows the importance of having a qualified
teacher for every student in the system. Students clearly learn more
when they are taught consistently by well-trained teachers.
Conversely, student performance suffers when forced to adjust to
frequent teacher vacancies and substitute teachers.

In many cases, teachers in the lowest-performing schools are not
certified to teach the grade level or subject they have been hired to
teach. Also, many current teacher training and professional
development programs are developed without any input from teachers and
are unrelated to their school's curriculum.

The school board must make a firm commitment to invest in the most
educated, dedicated teacher force Chicago has ever seen.

- Standardized tests. The policy of evaluating students based solely
on standardized test scores continues to muddle all of the issues
involved. There are too many tests, and consequently too much
classroom time spent on test preparation. Even the test's designers do
not recommend that they be used as the only determining factor in a
student's promotion or retention.

Based on their professional training, experience and expertise,
Chicago's teachers are fully qualified to assess student achievement.
The union will continue to push the Chicago Board of Education to
reconsider its current policy so that teacher recommendation, based on
a student's grades, effort, performance, test scores and attendance,
will determine promotion and retention.

- Working conditions. Smaller classes, increased respect and
meaningful, coordinated training programs will go a long way in
helping to attract and keep good teachers who might otherwise consider
careers in suburban schools. The fact remains, however, that Chicago
schools are unable to compete for the best teachers because of
depressed salary levels.

Chicago's high school teachers earn the lowest salaries in Cook,
DuPage or Lake Counties, and elementary school teachers rank 33rd in
that region. More money for teacher salaries must be viewed as an
investment in quality that ultimately benefits all of society,
producing students who can get well-paid jobs as young adults, and are
thus less likely to engage in crime, teenage parenting and other
anti-social behaviors.

The era of a laissez-faire Chicago Teachers Union that doesn't respond
vigorously to policies that have an adverse effect on its membership
is ending. The board of education should listen closely to its
teachers and their ideas, and provide the resources and respect we
need to do the best job we know how for all of Chicago's public school
students.

  


----------------------------------------------------
This is the CPS Mathematics Teacher Discussion List. 

To unsubscribe, send a message to
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

For more information:
<http://home.sprintmail.com/~mikelach/subscribe.html>.

To search the archives:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/science%40lists.csi.cps.k12.il.us/>

Reply via email to